picksspeeddownload.blogg.se

Wargame red dragon china deck
Wargame red dragon china deck













wargame red dragon china deck wargame red dragon china deck

The in-game Su-27S already got its ammo load reduced by taking into account 2 Sorbtsiya pods. Like many players have said countless times, J-8C need at least a pair of PL-8 missiles. To make matter worse, the ECM value also suffered because of this. Su-27SK, in another hand, has sufficient IRM, but the price of the aircraft is inflated due to unnecessarily large amount of R-27. It packs a pair of AIM-7 for initial strike, then he will use his 6(!) AIM-9M missiles to grind enemy fighters into dust. Trading two largely useless missiles for ECM increase is something most players will gladly accept.ĬF-18, for example, is a very good example of what a hi-end (not top of the line, that will be something like Rafale) air superiority fighter should be. In real world PLAAF always mount a pair of extra ECM pods at the wingtip pylons of their flanker fleet, from Su-27SK to Su-30MK2. I still insist that two R-27 missiles must be removed from Su-27SK. Both units are already in Chinese decks, and it is not hard to convert them into an armed or unarmed recon think 30% ECM is more or less enough given there are two Chinese aircraft sporting such ECM value. If a recon helicopter better than Mi-1 is what you are looking for, either Z-9 or SA.342 will do. TG92929 wrote:Z-11 is among the most useless post-1991 units China might get ( if China will get them).















Wargame red dragon china deck